Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 5 hours ago by Jeff G. in topic Self-promo

Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU • COM:ANI

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
  • Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
  • It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

عراق بغداد

[edit]

Continues to upload copyvios after final warning. Especially File:الشاعر التركماني الخالد فلك اوغلو.jpg is recreated time after time when deleted. All uploads should be gone through. Jonteemil (talk) 12:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. I blocked the user for a month and deleted all his/her uploads as likely copyvios. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo Iraq-telafer has recreated all the files. Clear sockpuppet. Jonteemil (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done by User:The Squirrel Conspiracy (indeffed) but shouldn't عراق بغداد's block be extended? Jonteemil (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I extended the block – now 3 months. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Paddy Mc Aloon

[edit]

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

What is "transclusion", If I may ask? Paddy Mc Aloon (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Paddy Mc Aloon: See Help:Transclusion.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Paddy Mc Aloon, see Transclusion, it's a technique to embed the content of one page into another one. Here, Jeff basically reports that you wrote an incomplete deletion request which is somewhat of a burden or hassle to clean up. You'd better use the tools available (Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets - use "AjaxQuickDelete") for that which help completing the formalities. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Right. I suggest that you use the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar provided by the AjaxQuickDelete gadget per subpolicy procedures COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:37, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Why isnt this just enabled by default Trade (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Trade: It is, but I can't make people use it.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done As with every other time you have brought this issue to this notice board, no admin action is necessary. Failure to understand the weird idiosyncrasies of wikimedia templates is not a blockable offense. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: What about the precedents I cited at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections/Archive 41#User:Menakei?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:39, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm not familiar with the specifics of those cases, but the fact that you have reported this issue, what, a few dozen times, and there are only two blocks tells me that blocks are the anomaly, not the expectation. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: So you are willing to let the subcats of Category:Incomplete deletion requests grow without bounds and without consequences?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:25, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't think that's quite the argument that you think it is. All of those subcategories are currently empty despite the fact that we have only blocked two users since 2020 (?) for this issue. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: That is only because I and maybe others have been policing them. Let's see what happens if I stop for a while.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:37, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Policing the categories is appropriate. I think even bringing the issue here for people who do dozens of these is appropriate, but don't expect them to be blocked unless they are basically replying with an "FU". @Jeff G.: do you clearly explain the issue to the users in question on their talk page before escalating to an administrative issue? Can you link an example of how you do that? - Jmabel ! talk 16:49, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: this is what I sent Paddy on 13 September 2023. Then there were four more edits before I escalated to ANB on 7 July, and then here above on 4 August. These days, I add MUST and mention the AjaxQuickDelete gadget as seen in Special:Permalink/1066192209.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:07, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
That 13 September 2023 message is awfully convoluted and confusing. I would not expect the average Commons user to understand readily what they should and shouldn't do by reading that. If this is the form of what you are routinely using as a warning, can you and I please work together on crafting something more to the point? - Jmabel ! talk 05:36, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: Sure. Is this the best venue for that? Perhaps we could make a template.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:01, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Fine by me. I'm really busy right now, but I copy-pasted at User:Jmabel/Draft deletion problem template to set up a place where we can work in this, and I'll give it a few minutes work now. - Jmabel ! talk 00:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Aganachil

[edit]

User: Aganachil (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: I don't think that this user is here to contribute meaningfully. Worst, he's propagating hate speech and racism, at best, he's writing uncouth jokes. Best evidence: File:Aryannations.webp and its description "English: motoryclegang" (it's actually a duplicate of File:Himmler besichtigt die Gefangenenlager in Russland. Heinrich Himmler inspects a prisoner of war camp in Russia, circa... - NARA - 540164.jpg). Further evidence: his other contributions, all related to motorcycle gangs (and often copyvios as screenshots). As far as I'm aware, MC gangs are really often associated with right-wing extremist and organised criminal acts, so I think that such a fanboy may endorse this kind of "culture". Grand-Duc (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

This user's uploads are all wildly out of scope as GTA fantasy/roleplay content; this one is no exception. Omphalographer (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done Blocked as clearly NOTHERE. Uploads deleted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Chaheray

[edit]

Continues to upload copyvios after three blocks and threat of indef by Yann after last block. For example File:IRTXI2021-22.jpg is stolen from the club website, which says © 2022 Ittihad Riadhi Tanger. All rights reserved. File:Ittihad Tanger Logo 2025.png is licensed with {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} but I see no proof of permission so unless it's deemed below COM:TOO Morocco or proof of permission is found, it too would be a copyvio. Jonteemil (talk) 21:57, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Fulfilled Yann's promise. --Lymantria (talk) 09:23, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

인케

[edit]

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:59, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Blocked for 6 months, 2 more files deleted. Yann (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Seyhan668

[edit]

Uploads three, what appears to be, obviously copyrighted logos way above TOO which I tagged with {{Logo}}. Has one prior block for copyvios in 2017. Jonteemil (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I deleted the files. They were uploaded 6 months ago (it looks like the uploader moved them over from Turkish Wikipedia), and the user has a bunch of other recent uploads that are fine. I'm inclined not to block in this case. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

User:Shnooper1

[edit]

Shnooper1 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) uploads my little pony copyvios and does not stop Isderion (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Blocked and uploads deleted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:03, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
thank you --Isderion (talk) 20:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Kiananjomani socks

[edit]

Seems to be blatant socks of Kiananjomani. Evidence from User:SteinsplitterBot/Previously deleted files:

Timestamp File Uploader Deleted file Uploader
Aug 07 2025 03:04 PM File:Wreckage of United Airlines Flight 232 N1819U in Sioux City.jpg Delete Google image search To be able and not the only be able for now (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 30 edits) File:Wreckage of United Airlines Flight 232 N1819U.jpg (Und | Log) Hello going in the same (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different)
Aug 07 2025 02:02 PM File:TAM Linhas Aéreas Airbus A320-233 PR-MBK photos at Salgado Filho Porto Alegre International Airport in 2007-05-03.jpg Delete Google image search To be able and not the only be able for now (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 30 edits) File:TAM Linhas Aéreas airbus a320 233 at Porto Alegre Salgado Filho - SBPA, Brazil in May 03, 2007.jpg (Und | Log) Mwl2014 (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different)
Aug 07 2025 02:02 PM File:TAM Linhas Aéreas Airbus A320-233 PR-MBK photos at Salgado Filho Porto Alegre International Airport in 2007-05-03.jpg Delete Google image search To be able and not the only be able for now (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 30 edits) File:TAM Linhas Aéreas airbus a320 233 at Porto Alegre Salgado Filho - SBPA, Brazil in May 03, 2007.jpg (Und | Log) What is known as the Ermenonville (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different)
Aug 07 2025 02:02 PM File:TAM Linhas Aéreas Airbus A320-233 PR-MBK photos at Salgado Filho Porto Alegre International Airport in 2007-05-03.jpg Delete Google image search To be able and not the only be able for now (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 30 edits) File:TAM Linhas Aéreas airbus a320 233 at Porto Alegre Salgado Filho - SBPA, Brazil in May 03, 2007.jpg (Und | Log) Xiao and for the flight was (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different)
Aug 07 2025 02:02 PM File:TAM Linhas Aéreas Airbus A320-233 PR-MBK photos at Salgado Filho Porto Alegre International Airport in 2007-05-03.jpg Delete Google image search To be able and not the only be able for now (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 30 edits) File:TAM Linhas Aéreas airbus a320 233 at Porto Alegre Salgado Filho - SBPA, Brazil in May 03, 2007.jpg (Und | Log) Have been a lot higher (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different)
Aug 07 2025 09:13 AM File:United Boeing 747 N4713U.jpg Delete Google image search Yes it was found on the aircraft (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks | 2 edits) File:United Airlines boeing 747 122 N4713U.jpg (Und | Log) Have been a lot higher (talk | contr | dcontr | accounts | blocks)(different)

Jonteemil (talk) 22:18, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. Both are now indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Good, should File:United Boeing 747 N4713U.jpg be deleted as well? Jonteemil (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. Done. --Lymantria (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

User:Zaragoza Turismo

[edit]

The user was blocked in eswiki by special purpose account and by his uploads seems to be a sockpuppet of User:CarlosArrimadas, please check carefully his contributions. Regards!!!! --Ezarateesteban 18:09, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

Sockpuppets persistantly reuploading File:Rohan Khan.jpg/File:Rohan khan.jpg. Jonteemil (talk) 12:11, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done All accounts blocked, last file deleted. Main account was warned before. Yann (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Yann File:Rohan khan.jpg was uploaded today by Special:Contribs/Nehakhan89 and it was swiftly deleted. Special:Contribs/Khatunhanifa has now recreated the file under another name. The first account has been locked and the second I reported on Meta but both are likely sockpuppets of the same as above. Jonteemil (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 15:30, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Jonteemil and locked per m:Steward requests/Global/2025-w32#Global lock for Khatunhanifa.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Harriesz

[edit]

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:42, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Blocked for a week, file deleted. Yann (talk) 15:32, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Khiao do (2 report)

[edit]

Por favor bloquea a este usuario y cierra los deletion requests inválidos (invalid Deletion Request) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

AadamK

[edit]

Reuploads File:Hyacinth and Sal.png which was deleted as copyvio. Also uploads File:Channels4 banner.jpg which also seems to be a blatant copyvio unless freely licensed at source (YouTube) which I cannot tell. Was warned with {{End of copyvios}} before both uploads. Jonteemil (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Copyvios deleted, blocked 2 weeks. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:04, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Redaktor1820

[edit]

Redaktor1820 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) Recent copyvios (1; 2; 3; 4 and so on) after the last warning. Quick1984 (talk) 06:11, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Deleted obvious copyvios; those that remain may be PD so leaving them for others to inspect. Blocked for 1 month. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Olga Rithme

[edit]

Olga Rithme (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Hi, This user keeps nominating File:Maison communale de La Panne.jpg and other files for deletion spite a lengthy discussion here and here (in French) explaining that there is no reason for deletion, and a warning. I suggest closing this DR, and blocking this user for some time. Yann (talk) 12:11, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, apologies if I'm not allowed to express myself here but as it's written in the page history, several times my speedy deletion request was canceled by admins telling I could start a normal deletion if I didn't agree with the cancellation. And like I was saying to @Yann on my talk page, users have right to appeal decisions. I'm sorry about the mess, I thought I could upload these files with freedom of panorama. I changed my mind reading an article about "droit d'auteur" (I'm not sure "copyright" is exactly same thing as in french) and now I think it was a mistake to upload these files like I try to explain it in my request. I will not keep uploading files during a time if it can help... Sorry again. Olga Rithme (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Self-promo

[edit]

Self-promo account / sockpuppetry. Jonteemil (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Both accounts blocked, last remaining upload deleted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Perfect, shouldn't the user pages be tagged with {{Sockpuppeteer}} and {{Sockpuppet}} respectively? Jonteemil (talk) 21:00, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Jonteemil: Yes, please do.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:43, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fiorysolmorales

[edit]

Promo-only account / spamming. Jonteemil (talk) 20:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply