Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop

Illustration Workshop

Map Workshop

Photography Workshop

Video and Sound Workshop

Skip to bottom | Skip to table of contents

Photography workshop

This workshop is part of the Graphic Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.

This specific page is the requests page for the Photography Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Make a request

Show manual procedures

Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):

<gallery>
 IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image
 IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one)
 ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though
</gallery>

;Request:
: Details of your request go here… --~~~~
;Graphist opinion(s):

▶

Make a new request

◀

Background removal

Article(s): en:Nightline, en:American Broadcasting Company, en:ABC World News Tonight

Request

Cleanup

remove what? Grunpfnul (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crack in glass plate image

Liberty ship Stanley R. Fisher on the river Scheldt
Negative image
Work in Progress

Article(s): [[]]

Request: Can the crack in the glass plate be removed and joined? The image is a bit on the dark side too, and could use more exposure. Thanks! --Niels Johannes (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Started the Restauration of this Image (Work in Progress). Crack is fixed, now Fingerprints and Emulsion are in dire need to be repaired, after that the Difference in the Luminance will be corrected Grunpfnul (talk) 22:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's looking so much better already. Looking forward for the final result. Vielen dank! Niels Johannes (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw the light reflexion

Article(s): Wikidata:Q134711133

Request: Is it possible withdraw the light reflexion on this photo? Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): NB: There are more images of this painting in Category:Baptism of Jesus Christ (Church of Nossa Senhora dos Mártires, Constância) that can help with this. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous colour profile

File with erroneous colour profile
Retouched picture

Request: repair colour profile to match e.g. File:Little Tern birds 6.jpg - MPF (talk) 15:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Sorry, i can't help here. Does no RAW exists? Grunpfnul (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPF: ~~I was able to reduce the color cast; please tell me whether it is good for you.~~

Done--Carnby (talk) 04:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up to improve appearance

Article(s): en:Paul Martin (illustrator) - reachable via the link in reference 201.

Request

Hello. I am the original uploader of this image. I still have the original magazine. I would like to avoid any alterations that would require a new file name. Please tweak this image to make it more presentable. Notice how there is a bluish tint or something in the lower-third left section, for instance. The background should be more naturally uniform. I'd appreciate just some touch-ups to improve the overall quality without creating a new file name. That might mean improving the focus and coloring and removing any glare area. I attempted to improve the image with my basic image editor on May 2, 2025 (under "File history"). However, I seemed to give it an artificial glitter appearance instead. Update. I increased size and tried again w/o success on 7/5.

Graphist opinion(s)

Image restorations

Article(s): de:Nikolaikirche (Heilbronn), de:Jakob Friedrich Bengel, de:Villa Rümelin (Wilhelmstraße), de:Liste der abgegangenen Heilbronner Gebäude und Denkmäler

Request

Could someone restorate these old pictures, so they look more clearly? Thanks in advance.--RaveDog (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RaveDog:

1st one at https://ibb.co/99dFL2gf

2nd one dehalftoned at https://ibb.co/6JX7kh3N

3rd one sharpened (AI was no good) at https://ibb.co/W4sMznY1

4th dehalftoned at https://ibb.co/9mSTD4YG

5th is a pain in the ass! Too many holes, and they're everywhere. The PSD is at https://files.catbox.moe/j9e48z.psd. I might work on it later, but I got some of the holes and fixed the highlights. JayCubby (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work! For the 5th one we might wait as you said. @Rosenzweig As a long-time editor of articles about Heilbronn topics, what do you think? Are the edited versions appropriate for the Wikipedia articles listed above? RaveDog (talk) 21:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They're not worse, but also not that much better. With the original files being as bad as they are, you can't expect that much of an improvement apparently. So I'm rather indifferent about it. --Rosenzweig τ 05:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your opinion. Thanks again to the editor of the images. RaveDog (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it didn't take me very long at all. It's a lot easier to dedither higher-resolution images, generally. JayCubby (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Watermark

Article(s): wikidata:Q135243456

Request

Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done-- Carnby (talk) 08:27, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:15, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Watermark

Article(s): wikidata:Q135244141

Request

Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done-- Carnby (talk) 08:27, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:15, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Sonoma Plaza

Article(s): Sonoma Plaza

Request

This pic set needs adjustment.--Carnby (talk) 04:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez. That's pretty bad. For the first one, File:VIEW FROM NORTH-EAST (FRONT) - Blue Wing Inn, 133 East Spain Street, Sonoma, Sonoma County, CA HABS CAL,49-SONO,3-1.tif or File:Sonoma - Blue Wing Inn - 20201025013755.jpg might be viable replacements. JayCubby (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Watermark

Article(s): wikidata:Q135316365

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Done-- Carnby (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:15, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Sioux Indian execution

Article(s): Extensive

Request: Could someone restore the image? It's far too large for me to work with. It just needs color correction and some crease removal --JayCubby (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Done Auguel (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

Article(s): wikidata:Q135399024

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 07:15, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Done--Carnby (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Touchup for old photo

Portrait photograph of Simón Radowitzky in 1908

Article(s): Simón Radowitzky

Request: This is the highest resolution version of this photo that I have been able to find. There's still some signs of the photograph's age, with scratches and fading, and the contrast leaves a bit to the imagination. If anyone here is able to give this a wee clean up, I'd really appreciate it. --Grnrchst (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

I increased the contrast Auguel (talk) 13:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

Article(s): wikidata:Q134545896

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Done--Carnby (talk) 07:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Ambassadors

Remove the microphone and the face behind it
Remove the text and make the image clearer

Article(s): en:List of ambassadors of Indonesia

Request

Please make amendments on the image based on the captions; just override the image and upload directly onto it! Thank you --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael ^(marhata) 23:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeromi Mikhael

2nd one done. JayCubby (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First one

Done Auguel (talk) 02:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Crop photo

Article(s): it:Lamborghini Temerario, it:DeTomaso Pantera

Request: Crop photos to focus only on car. --37.159.49.195 09:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Comment: @37.159.49.195: This is the sort of easy enough work you can do yourself quite easily by using the "Crop Tool" and leaving this page for more complex requests. When you want to crop an image I suggest you consider using the CropTool that can be activated in your commons Preferences, under Gadgets. The CropTool will then appears in the left side of your screen. It saves everyone a lot of time because it transfers all the correct and appropriate information into the cropped image, such as source, license, author, etc. It even leaves a backlink to the original and visa versa so long as the original has been positively reviewed. That way all the proper information is there and most often does not need to be manually reviewed again. If you are just cropping a small bit of the image like a frame you may decide to overwrite the original image but for more major crops you should upload the cropped version as a separate new image with a new name, but you have a choice. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Henk Lambooij

mayor H.A. Lambooij (2025)

Article(s): Henk Lambooij

Request

Please do a lens correction? --Vera ^(talk) 16:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Made an approach - if it won't please you, just revert Grunpfnul (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Vera ^(talk) 21:41, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Grunpfnul (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Watermark

Article(s): pt:Ancede wikidata:Q134726581

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Merging 2 images

Tracy's Rock (Split Rock), AS17-140-21497
Tracy's Rock (Split Rock), AS17-140-21493
Expected result

Article(s): en:Apollo 17, en:Tracy's Rock, en:Taurus–Littrow, etc.

Request

I have tried to merge the first 2 images to get the third one, but it seems I get parallax issues. Does anyone know how to do that? Thanks in advance. --Yann (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did a try by myself - the Markers (Crosses) will always get distorted, because of the tilted original Negatives. The Astronauts weren't professional Photographers (but still got trained well for the mission), so they tilted a lot - he should have walked a few steps aside, instead of swaying the camera (and should have taken more attention to not tilt his camera) ;-) I can upload my version if wanted Grunpfnul (talk) 13:24, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My try

Grunpfnul (talk) 13:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grunpfnul: Great work! We can't even see the stitching, contrary to File:AS17-140-21493+AS17-140-21497.jpg. I removed the red overcast. I also removed the Creative Commons license, unless you want to claim a copyright for stitching? Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surely not, I just copied the Informations and this was a mistake ;) Grunpfnul (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Yann (talk) 15:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): wikidata:Q135650535

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 20:41, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): wikidata:Q135650829

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): Commons:Category:Tarouca (cidade)

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 08:36, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): wikidata:Q134018694

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 13:16, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): wikidata:Q135656132

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 21:57, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): Malhou

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 09:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Article(s): Mizarela

Request: Would you please withdraw the watermark? Thank you, GualdimG (talk) 13:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): Done ReneeWrites (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Making concert picture clearer

SZA performing "Scorsese Baby Daddy" on the Grand National Tour in London
Cropped version

Article(s): Scorsese Baby Daddy

Request

The backlighting is messing things up (highlights/shadows are off, pic looks somewhat hazy). Would like the image to overall look clearer. Thanks :) --PSA (talk) 06:45, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

is this what you had in mind?

Grunpfnul (talk) 07:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

Clean up image

Article(s): nl:Lodewijk Ontrop and wikidata

Request: Can someone clean up the white marks, thanks ---- Deadstar (msg) 20:53, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s): This seems like a fun challenge, I just need a day or so to get to it.; Request taken by ReneeWrites (talk) 21:46, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extract

Article(s): en:2002 Marib airstrike

Request: Could pictures 8 and 11 be extracted from this reel? --- Hsnkn (talk) 20:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s)

	SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved\|1=~~~~}} after 10 days and sections whose resolved comment is older than 185 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2025. Template:Autoarchive resolved section/parameter timecompare set to 'resolved'

Photography workshop

Make a request

See also

Background removal

Crack in glass plate image

Withdraw the light reflexion

Erroneous colour profile

Clean up to improve appearance

Image restorations

Watermark

Watermark

Sonoma Plaza

Watermark

Sioux Indian execution

Watermark

Touchup for old photo

Watermark

Ambassadors

Crop photo

Henk Lambooij

Watermark

Merging 2 images

Watermark

Watermark

Watermark

Watermark

Watermark

Watermark

Watermark

Making concert picture clearer

Clean up image

Extract