Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2025 at 05:10:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Airliners
Info A Boeing 777-300ER, (JA740J, Japan Airlines Flight 15) experiences an engine failure while climbing out of Los Angeles International Airport. Created by Glenn Beltz – uploaded by 4300streetcar – nominated by Brainandforce -- Brainandforce (talk) 05:10, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support High quality capture of a very rare event. -- Brainandforce (talk) 05:10, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:32, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2025 at 04:27:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Geraniaceae
Info Standing witte Pelargonium zonale. A Pelargonium zonale that is not winter-hardy in the Netherlands. Focus stack of 47 photos.
all by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support, useful image of good quality. @Agnes Monkelbaan: , there is a distraction at the 3:30 position. I think it is a dew-covered silk strand. JayCubby (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Done. hot pixels removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2025 at 21:32:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Birds_in_wooded_areas
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:18, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:07, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2025 at 19:59:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Panthera_leo_(Lions)
Info Lion (Panthera leo), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. Native to Sub-Saharan Africa and India, this big cat is a social species, forming groups called prides, which consists of a few adult males, related females, and cubs. Groups of female lions usually hunt together, preying mostly on medium-sized and large ungulates. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:07, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:47, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2025 at 16:49:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ericaceae
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 16:49, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 16:49, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support That's an incredible shot. Wolverine X-eye 18:12, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Top of the plant is slightly OOF. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. To capture a plant in nature completely in focus, the aperture must be closed relatively wide. However, this means that more of the surroundings will also be in focus. It's important to find a good compromise. I would have liked to open the aperture even further, but then too much of the image would have been out of focus. Nevertheless, I sharpened the top of the plant a little at your suggestion. --XRay 💬 04:05, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2025 at 14:32:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Cervidae_(Deer)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Look of endearing innocence! The gallery is mostly adults, largely male. --Tagooty (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support That's so cute! My goodness. Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:17, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support And I have to say, I'm impressed at how well your camera handles ISO 3200! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:07, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Charming Bambi portrait -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2025 at 11:58:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
Info As I was doing some night photography and trying to capture this early 20th-century theatre, two people began browsing the upcoming performances while waiting for their ride. I think it presented an interesting opportunity, similar to the excellent File:Dairy Queen Gastonia NC1.jpg. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I like it a lot. Looks almost painterly at thumbnail, and while the phone kind of dashes that at full size :) I still think it works. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:35, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Precisely composed scene with warm lighting and clear symmetry - strongly reminiscent of Edward Hopper in its quiet everyday intimacy. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Well, with an introduction like that ... The colors are warm and attractive, and the presence of people makes it relatable and inviting. If Hopper had painted Nighthawks today everybody's head would be down looking at their phones. I've added a street photography category. Acroterion (talk) 12:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I wonder what film they're discussing? Wolverine X-eye 18:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- I've added information on the poster just across from them; it's the opening night of the Windsor Symphony Orchestra's 2025 season. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow. This looks like a POTY candidate to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support :-) --XRay 💬 04:08, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 07:34, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2025 at 09:16:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Apidae_(Bumble_Bees,_Honey_Bees,_Carpenter_Bees,_Cuckoo_Bees,_Orchid_Bees,_and_Stingless_Bees)
Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not much in focus; much better images in the gallery. DoF at f/8 and 400mm insufficient. --Tagooty (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 15:44:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for nominating this striking photo. The angles here are extreme enough that I went to check other photos of the same building. Looking at e.g. File:Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Blick von Osten.1.29132.ajb.jpg, it does look like this is heavily distorted. As photographic art, intentionally exaggerated, it may still be valuable, but as documentation of the building probably not so much. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:23, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 15:19:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Unknown – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 15:19, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 15:19, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:28, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 11:20, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 15:17:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family_:_Bombyliidae_(Bee_Flies)
Info Tiger bee fly (Xenox tigrinus). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 15:17, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:17, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good-quality photo. Wolverine X-eye 18:06, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 09:39:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Zygaenidae (Burnet Moths)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support A mating couple, how nice? Wolverine X-eye 18:03, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Well... if we are going anthropomorphic, a voyeur too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:10, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 09:05:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Apidae_(Bumble_Bees,_Honey_Bees,_Carpenter_Bees,_Cuckoo_Bees,_Orchid_Bees,_and_Stingless_Bees)
Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 03:04:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Others
Info This little sassy helicopter had most of us gadget-loving space nerds spellbound when it performed well above all expectations during its flights on Mars. There are many photos of it, but I selected this since it's in its element on Mars, the photo has good quality, high resolution and a pleasing composition. Created by NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Simeon Schmauß – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Cart. -- Cart (talk) 03:04, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sidenote: We have plenty of FPs taken by drones, but I can't seem to find a single FP of a drone of any sort. Surely there must be some shots that are photogenic enough to be nominated.
Support -- Cart (talk) 03:04, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- vip (talk) 09:31, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:29, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 02:45:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Landscapes of astronomical objects
Info Seeing all the historical photos of space explorations, it's easy to forget that we have loads of fantastic new photos from recent missions. There are so many educational, beautiful and mind-blowing photos from Mars that it's hard to know where to start. I think I can indulge in selecting one for its beauty, as well as for its quality and educational value.
- These feathery carbon dioxide clouds over an outcrop named Mont Mercou on Mars, were photographed on Sol 3063 by the Curiosity rover. Created by NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Simeon Schmauß – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Cart. -- Cart (talk) 02:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 02:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Question Is it supposed to be so dark? Was it taken at night? Yann (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- This was taken just after sunset when these clouds are visible. Twilight on Mars is darker than on Earth because of the thin atmosphere. From NASA's page about these clouds: "The fine, rippling structures of these clouds are easier to see with images from Curiosity’s black-and-white navigation cameras. But it's the color images from the rover's Mast Camera, or Mastcam, that really shine – literally. Viewed just after sunset, their ice crystals catch the fading light, causing them to appear to glow against the darkening sky. These twilight clouds, also known as "noctilucent" (Latin for "night shining") clouds, grow brighter as they fill with crystals, then darken after the Sun's position in the sky drops below their altitude. This is just one useful clue scientists use to determine how high they are." The page was linked to on the file page, but you are right, the text should be on the page as well. Now fixed and category added. --Cart (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support OK then. Yann (talk) 15:56, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support An exceptional image of glowing carbon dioxide clouds on Mars, reminiscent of the rare noctilucent clouds seen on Earth. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Exactly per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Evening sky on Mars! Acroterion (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2025 at 02:02:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:18, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support The strong diagonal in the foreground draws the eye into the scene, while vivid color contrasts and a gentle reflection add both depth and a sense of serenity. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--XRay 💬 19:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support - Serene. — ERcheck (talk). 00:03, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:43, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:00, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I love these forest images. Wolverine X-eye 17:50, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 01:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2025 at 21:23:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
Info Ceiling of the rotunda of the Mariinsky Palace. created by Lvova – uploaded by Lvova – nominated by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Please remember that it's your responsibility as nominator to make sure the file page is in order. I have wikified the text and added all the missing categories for you, remember to fix that yourself on your future nominations. --Cart (talk) 21:39, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- You overcategorised (added Category:Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg) in the same time with Category:Quality images of Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg)), corrected the text to your taste (it is not 'wikification')... Thank you, but it doesn't say that the page wasn't 'in order'. Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Quality images of Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg) is a hidden category, not seen if you are not logged in and have your settings to see such categories. It's only an administrative category for Commons users, so it's not over-cat to add the Category:Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg), which is the category that is seen by non-Commoners. But since there is now so many photos of the interior, I've created a new category for all those. I copy edited the English text into better English, to make it more understandable and easier to read. And no, the page was not in order, since you had no categories at all that weren't hidden. Images on Commons need to be accessible for anybody, not just Commons users. --Cart (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- since you had no categories at all that weren't hidden - when I discussed such cases with other people who manage categories of the city, they claim that there is no problem. So I even share the idea that it should be something else but will not fight for changing of the local consensus. Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:17, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Quality images of Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg) is a hidden category, not seen if you are not logged in and have your settings to see such categories. It's only an administrative category for Commons users, so it's not over-cat to add the Category:Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg), which is the category that is seen by non-Commoners. But since there is now so many photos of the interior, I've created a new category for all those. I copy edited the English text into better English, to make it more understandable and easier to read. And no, the page was not in order, since you had no categories at all that weren't hidden. Images on Commons need to be accessible for anybody, not just Commons users. --Cart (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- You overcategorised (added Category:Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg) in the same time with Category:Quality images of Mariinsky Palace (Saint Petersburg)), corrected the text to your taste (it is not 'wikification')... Thank you, but it doesn't say that the page wasn't 'in order'. Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good job. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support A good result, despite the smartphone quality; it is solidly executed and visually appealing. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2025 at 20:55:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United States
Info This evocative image captures the historic Magalia Community Church, completed in 1904 by the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, incorporating elements from an earlier incomplete structure. Though shaded by surrounding trees, delicate sunbeams spill across the weathered wooden shingles, infusing the scene with quiet charm. Photographing the chapel is inherently challenging due to its wooded setting, yet this shot succeeds beautifully - its composition, mood, and detail underscore both architectural heritage and the photographer's skill and patience. Created and uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Fleeting sunlight filtering through dense trees highlights the historic wooden structure's charm in an atmospheric, well-executed image. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 11:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Charming photo of this nice chapel; it has an interesting history. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support This is indeed a beautiful chapel. Wolverine X-eye 17:40, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2025 at 20:55:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info This striking autumn view captures Stuttgart's neo-Gothic St. John's Church, beautifully situated on a peninsula in Feuersee pond. The photo's balanced composition, warm seasonal colors, and sharp detail highlight the church's historic and architectural significance. Its serene atmosphere and technical quality make it a strong candidate for Featured Picture status. Created and uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support The photo combines architectural and historical significance with a painterly composition. Its sharpness, lighting, and mood beautifully reflect Stuttgart's cultural heritage. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per nom; beautiful! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:14, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, I love the heron cameo. Might have a tiny bit too much vibrancy, but the light is lovely. --Cart (talk) 03:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:10, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:40, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--XRay 💬 19:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 23:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
*
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:22, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Duplicate voting struck through. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:40, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition and colours --Tagooty (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Many thanks for the nomination, Radomianin – much appreciated! –, and thank you all for your support. – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks like a Disney castle. Wolverine X-eye 17:31, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Stunning. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:04, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2025 at 20:19:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Stars
Info created by ESO – uploaded by Fabian RRRR – nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 09:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:35, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. Most similar FPs are in the Stars section of the gallery page, therefore I took the liberty to tweak the gallery link. – Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2025 at 17:18:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Genus_:_Taurotragus_(Elands) (gallery link doesn't exist yet)
Info Young male of common eland (Taurotragus oryx), Maasai Mara, Kenya. This large savannah and plains antelope is found in East and Southern Africa. An adult male is around 1.6 m (5.2 ft) tall at the shoulder and can weigh up to 942 kg (2,077 lb) with a typical range of 500–600 kg (1,100–1,300 lb). It is the second-largest antelope in the world, being slightly smaller on average than the giant eland. Mainly a herbivore, its diet is primarily grasses and leaves. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Taurotragus (elands), the biggest living antelopes in the world. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Question Are you sure the white balance is OK? The colors seem too cold/blue. Yann (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yann: I had warmed it before, but went a bit further Poco a poco (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Peaceful scene. –
Question For me the birds are a big plus for the photo. Any chance to identify them? E.g., could these be Red-billed Oxpeckers (Buphagus erythrorhynchus) or a related species (just guessing, I am not an expert)? – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Right, Aristeas, that's it. I added an additional cat Poco a poco (talk) 17:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2025 at 12:03:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Landscapes of astronomical objects
Info Harrison H. Schmitt and Tracy's Rock by Apollo 17 commander Eugene A. Cernan on December 13, 1972 during the third EVA at the Taurus-Littrow landing site.
Info created by Eugene A. Cernan, edited by Grunpfnul and Yann, nominated by Yann
Support This is a notable picture, and thanks to Grunpfnul, we now have a very high resolution version. Also stitching is better than previous version. We probably need a new section for this. -- Yann (talk) 12:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
About files and names
|
---|
|
Support --Cart (talk) 16:18, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:35, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 23:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2025 at 17:12:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail_vehicles#United_Kingdom
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--XRay 💬 04:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:03, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Alexander-93 (talk) 11:48, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Would have been nicer in the other direction, looking at the locomotive instead of the back of the train Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment We're indeed looking at the end of the train but it's two DMUs (diesel multiple units) coupled together, they look the same (ignoring headlights and the presence of a driver neither of which you can see from this angle) regardless of which way they're going. There's no locomotive. --Kabelleger (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:11, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support It's the magnificent landscape that makes the view so attractive. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:10, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2025 at 17:12:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
Info created by Rolf Kranz – uploaded by Rolf Kranz – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:49, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately, the main part of the image is in shadow and the right side is rather blurred. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree the right is slightly less sharp than the left but the image is 42 megapixels so I didn't think it mattered. Thank you for your review anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the nomination and the reply to Ermell. Rolf Kranz (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with Ermell, borderline to me, I go for
Neutral Poco a poco (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with Ermell, borderline to me, I go for
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:16, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
File:Bride offering her respects to God through a traditional gesture known as Namaskaram (01)-1.jpg
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2025 at 15:58:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created and originally uploaded by I.Mahesh, edited by Cart – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:58, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support beautiful portrait -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:58, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Comments about versions
|
---|
|
Comment Per the suggestions, with Cart's help, I have substituted the nom to the retouched version of Cart. Pinging @Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Crisco 1492: also. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:53, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:13, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:49, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:51, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:34, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 11:22, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I have seen similar photos among the Wiki Loves Folklore contributions, but unfortunately many of them had either an unfortunate composition or obvious technical problems; all the more I appreciate that this one is well-composed and beautiful, even more thanks to Cart’s edit. – Aristeas (talk) 16:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2025 at 15:58:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Papilionidae#Genus_:_Battus
Info Pipevine swallowtail butterfly (Battus philenor). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 15:58, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:58, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, superb quality and detail and excellent angle Cmao20 (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful image. --Wil540 art (talk) 16:40, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good image of a butterfly showing its incredible wings. Wolverine X-eye 18:34, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:04, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool. --Thi (talk) 23:04, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cma20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:27, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:55, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Extraordinary! --Cart (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2025 at 07:24:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Japan
Info created by Koichi Hayakawa – uploaded by Agakambara – nominated by 阿南之人 -- Пусть от победы☆к победе ведёт! 07:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Пусть от победы☆к победе ведёт! 07:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Hi 阿南之人 and welcome to FPC. You can only have one gallery for your nomination, please select one of the three you have added and remove the other two. However, if the photo is promoted to FP, you can place it in several Featured picture categories. --Cart (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment A beautiful image but way too low resolution, way too unsharp. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:53, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
I don't see any unsharpness, but at just 2.1 megapixels it barely clears the minimum size requirements for FP and I don't think that's enough for a fairly easy to reproduce shot. Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Oppose
Comment @UnpetitproleX and Cmao20: this was a downscaled version; I uploaded the original from the source.
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support thanks The Cosmonaut. FP now. Some noise in the water but not an issue for such a beautiful file at this high size. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Eyecatching, but seems like the saturation was cranked up a bit too high. That's not just a taste thing, but also about some loss of detail (many of the reds have turned into smears even while detail is visible in other areas with similar distance). — Rhododendrites talk | 16:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice scene, but the processing is not good, oversaturation, noise and plenty of posterization. --Cart (talk) 03:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2025 at 02:20:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States
Info The spillway and its bridge at New Croton Dam, New York in late winter. Completed in 1906 to impound water for New York City, it was at the time the tallest dam in the world, and is one of the largest stone masonry structures in the world. Created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice stormy mood Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support for the dramatic light — Rhododendrites talk | 16:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Dramatic view, showcasing impressive engineering and scale in a sharp, well-composed image. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:57, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:35, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:54, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support This is what great light looks like! --Cart (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:13, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Unusual angle and lighting. Note: I think this fits better in the Gallery Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States. --Tagooty (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- I had some trouble deciding where it should go, since the bridge is an accessory to the dam, but that works too. Acroterion (talk) 16:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- To me, the bridge is the main subject, a (small) part of dam is an incidental part of the image. Tagooty (talk) 03:03, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- OK with me, gallery adjusted accordingly. Acroterion (talk) 03:14, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- To me, the bridge is the main subject, a (small) part of dam is an incidental part of the image. Tagooty (talk) 03:03, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- I had some trouble deciding where it should go, since the bridge is an accessory to the dam, but that works too. Acroterion (talk) 16:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2025 at 21:50:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia
Info created by Survey of India – uploaded by Yann – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:50, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support high resolution, historical. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:50, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:21, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 15:30, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2025 at 21:53:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created and firstly uploaded by Susan Valentim – cropped and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:55, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely three-quarter view with great lighting. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:59, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--XRay 💬 04:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:33, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition and quality; thanks to Cmao20 for pointing out this image and to Heylenny for nominating it. – Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:21, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Alexander-93 (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2025 at 17:18:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info Mountains at Collioure, by André Derain, 1905. 81.3 × 100.3 cm; oil on canvas, National Gallery of Art, Washington DC, USA
Info created by André Derain, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support educational value, even if I personally don't understand the painting. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wil540 art (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per UnpetitproleX Cmao20 (talk) 17:15, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:32, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good reproduction of an exemplary fauvist painting. – Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2025 at 12:02:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 12:02, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 12:02, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice early morning light and it's always good to see the colours of heather in blossom. Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment The foreground is out of focus... --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:09, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. The focus is on the solitary tree. It is not necessary for the foreground to be in focus. The blurring also creates a depth effect. --XRay 💬 17:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes - I noticed the blurring but it just isn't really the focus of this image. For me it's the totality of the composition that matters, it's not a documentary photo aimed at showing us what heather looks like. Cmao20 (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- It is a beautiful photo and scenery, but I disagree. I think this image would be much better without the blurry/OOF foreground (almost the entire bottom third). Would have been nicer to see the detail in the near grass, so that the farther can be better appreciated. The tree is not interesting enough to be the sole focus of the image. So I
Oppose. I am sorry. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:10, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- It is a beautiful photo and scenery, but I disagree. I think this image would be much better without the blurry/OOF foreground (almost the entire bottom third). Would have been nicer to see the detail in the near grass, so that the farther can be better appreciated. The tree is not interesting enough to be the sole focus of the image. So I
- Yes - I noticed the blurring but it just isn't really the focus of this image. For me it's the totality of the composition that matters, it's not a documentary photo aimed at showing us what heather looks like. Cmao20 (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support My goodness the maroon-colored grass is a sight to behold. Wolverine X-eye 17:36, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The colors are nice but the compo is not appealing to me, sorry Dietmar. Poco a poco (talk) 06:34, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: did u mean to oppose? Your comment seems to suggest so... UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant to oppose. Thank you, Poco a poco (talk) 16:31, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful landscape in good light and with intense colours. I appreciate the slight blur of the foreground; it adds a feeling of depth, and “photography consists of light and shadow, sharpness and unsharpness” (Feininger). – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support The color contrast is very appealing for me --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:08, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support For me, the image comes to life in full-screen mode - that's when it feels most vibrant. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:10, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 14:25, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2025 at 10:00:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Camaenidae
Info The Manus green tree snail or Emerald green snail (Papustyla pulcherrima) is found only on Manus Island, a densely forested island to the north of Papua New Guinea. The Manus green tree snail is an icon of the island and is heavily featured in the ceremonial dress of Manusians, and appears on the provincial flag. Large-scale habitat destruction caused by logging appears to be the greatest threat by far, with the expected loss of the snails being directly proportional to the amount of forest removed. Besides habitat destruction over-collection for shells is an additional threat. It is classified as ‘Near Threatened’; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Green shells!! A rarity in FPC. Wolverine X-eye 17:37, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking emerald-green coloration with fine shell grain - fascinating. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support interesting colors. --Mile (talk) 18:56, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support green and black naturally go well together, but I can't make up my mind on whether it is best combination (vs green on white) for illustrative purposes. A striking image in any case. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:17, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment I don't think the white aperture stands out well against a white background, see here, but if you want to, you can download it. --Llez (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:11, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool colour, like some fancy design item from the 1950s–70s. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2025 at 04:30:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
Info Three flower buds of a (Hypericum) in development in different stages. Focus stack of 12 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice. Would be interesting to know which species of Hypericum this is. -- -donald- (talk) 11:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your question and your vote: it's probably Hypericum patulum. But because there are many varieties, I didn't include that name because I'm not 100% sure.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:04, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely colours and great quality + composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:02, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely use of yellow and green; two colors that always compliment each other. Wolverine X-eye 17:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:53, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wil540 art (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2025 at 21:22:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Association football (soccer)
Info Foley Meir midfielder Lucas Baker plays a through ball towards his striker, Jay Finney. The angle of view gives us a great perspective of the direction of the pass, the run of the striker and the concern on the defenders' faces. Created, uploaded and nominated by me -- BigDom (talk) 21:22, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- BigDom (talk) 21:22, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not outstanding enough for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:04, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2025 at 15:32:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice view and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 16:37, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support though personally I rather would prefer a bit more of the columns so we can see the rest of the arch. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:37, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:59, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good photo of a very beautiful ceiling in a style which is AFAIK rather rare in Italian church architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 09:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2025 at 19:36:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info The image shows one of about 1,000 Borgward Isabella convertibles in front of Schwetzingen Palace exhibited at Classic-Gala 2021. Created by Alexander-93 – uploaded by Alexander-93 – nominated by Alexander-93 -- Alexander-93 (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexander-93 (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Crop is far too close, such that we can't really see the environment to the sides. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Not seeing the issue with the crop. I don't think there's anything interesting in the 'environment to the sides', the car is well placed in the frame with a little bit of lead room to the left in the direction it's facing. The surroundings are interesting and the fact that the facade of the Schloss Schwetzingen is not centrally placed but rather is offset to the top right adds some dynamism and tension to the composition. The image is high quality and the subject is sharply focussed. A flaw is the distracting yellow vehicles in the background, but you couldn't do much about that. Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:10, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:37, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:30, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Info The colors or the white balance are off. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment I uploaded an updated image with a better white balance. Thanks for the info.--Alexander-93 (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Now it works. Thanks! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2025 at 17:59:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info created by Alexis Lours – uploaded by Alexis Lours – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Despite slight blown highlights in some places, this is an excellent bird photo Cmao20 (talk) 23:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support A good image overall. Wolverine X-eye 04:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Great job by previous voters... totally ignoring that the file had a bare-bones description and only one relevant category. I've fixed it now, but please pay attention before you vote. --Cart (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support and thanks to Cart for her vigilance.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:47, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Question Very beautiful and a good nomination, but sorry I wonder why there is kind of a halo around some contours, esp. at the bird’s tail. Either the lens has very special optical characteristics, or the background was retouched, e.g. blurred. Of course that is OK, but then it would be nice to declare the background editing with a {{Retouched}} template. @Alexis Lours: can you give us an insight? Thank you, – Aristeas (talk) 13:57, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- The background isn't retouched, I don't do any editing to my pictures besides cropping, denoising and color correction from the raw file. The raw files shows a similar halo around the tail, probably due to a mix of shallow depth of field at 800mm with a bit of CA. Sadly, isn't easily fixable near the tail and legs due to it being orange CA, and well, these body parts also being orange.
- I uploaded a new version because my purple CA slider was also a bit off towards the beak.
- Happy to provide the raw and/or denoised DNG if anybody want to give a shot at trying to fix the CA to upload another revision. Alexis Lours (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 21:04:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1980-1989
Info FP on English Wikipedia. Created by Agência Brasil (EBC) – uploaded by Sturm – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:04, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:04, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:26, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Could someone add a description in English please? Yann (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice historical event photo. – Aristeas (talk) 17:19, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:21, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wil540 art (talk) 16:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 18:29:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Alopochen
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice 'action shot' Cmao20 (talk) 10:50, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Good image of two birds in active motion. Wolverine X-eye 18:01, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:28, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 01:50:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Outdoor events
Info created by w:Jean-Léon Gérôme – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Our wiki article on the painting explains the context a bit better than I can. -- JayCubby (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 09:41, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:15, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support a significant painting, and in satisfactory (even if not extraordinary) quality. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- It was by far the best I could find, but maybe someone will make a better scan someday. JayCubby (talk) 02:28, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg (delist and replace)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 16:48:38
Info The Blue Marble, by Apollo 17
Info Much higher resolution and better quality of the same picture. Much more details are available at the same resolution. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 16:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:59, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:09, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace Indeed more details (thank you for the comparison) and also better colours (as far as I can assess this without having been in the space ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 09:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace per above. Cmao20 (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --Wyslijp16 (talk) 07:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 13:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 16:35:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Neutral as Uploader-- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful closter and bell tower, good composition. I really like how you have managed the difficult light. Normally this should not work because much of the façades is in the shadow, but thanks to the composition with the dominating bell tower and to the HDR the photo really impresses me. – Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 09:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 03:57, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I honestly wish the tower was quite a lot sharper, but the overall composition does convince me Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak support: despite suboptimal lighting and sharpness, manages to wow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Thu 07 Aug → Tue 12 Aug Fri 08 Aug → Wed 13 Aug Sat 09 Aug → Thu 14 Aug Sun 10 Aug → Fri 15 Aug Mon 11 Aug → Sat 16 Aug Tue 12 Aug → Sun 17 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sun 03 Aug → Tue 12 Aug Mon 04 Aug → Wed 13 Aug Tue 05 Aug → Thu 14 Aug Wed 06 Aug → Fri 15 Aug Thu 07 Aug → Sat 16 Aug Fri 08 Aug → Sun 17 Aug Sat 09 Aug → Mon 18 Aug Sun 10 Aug → Tue 19 Aug Mon 11 Aug → Wed 20 Aug Tue 12 Aug → Thu 21 Aug
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.